Sellers in Houston typically expect to cut their listing price 5 to 6 percent just to generate interest, according to Kurt Peterson, a real estate agent with World Wide Realty based in Texas. But a subset of transactions is producing the opposite result – homes closing above market value, with sellers netting proceeds they did not expect to see. The mechanism is deal structuring: subject-to transactions, wraparound mortgages, and other creative financing tools that match sellers carrying low-rate mortgages with buyers who cannot qualify through traditional lending channels.
Peterson’s business focuses on connecting non-bank-qualified buyers, people with high income but credit disruptions, divorce-related setbacks, or 1099 earnings that do not fit conventional underwriting, with sellers whose existing mortgage terms create a financing advantage neither side could access on their own.
Why Sellers Are Hesitant
Houston is firmly in buyer’s market territory. Peterson describes sellers as apprehensive, expecting homes to sit for 90 to 100 days and anticipating price reductions to attract attention. For sellers in vacant properties carrying holding costs, the pressure grows over time.
Creative financing changes that equation by making the seller’s existing mortgage rate part of the deal’s value. When a seller has a rate well below current market levels, a buyer can come in through a subject-to arrangement or wraparound mortgage, effectively inheriting that lower rate without going through a bank. The seller, in turn, can command a higher price because the financing terms – not just the property – are part of what the buyer is purchasing.
Peterson says he works to show sellers that “there’s more than just listing it on the MLS.” He is clear that MLS exposure remains essential for reaching the widest buyer pool, but argues that the additional layer of marketing to non-bank-qualified buyers shifts what would otherwise be a buyer’s market dynamic closer to balance.
For sellers facing the prospect of price cuts and extended listing periods, the difference between a traditional sale and a creatively structured one can mean the difference between bringing cash to closing and walking away with a net gain.
A Georgetown Case Study
A recent transaction in Georgetown illustrates the mechanics. The seller had an underlying interest rate of roughly 4.75 percent. Under a traditional sale, Peterson estimates the seller would have needed to bring cash to closing after factoring in price reductions, closing costs, and agent fees. Instead, by marketing the property’s financing terms to a homestead buyer, the home sold approximately $22,000 over market value.
The buyer came in roughly two full percentage points below prevailing interest rates, lowering monthly costs substantially. “He even gave me a review saying it was a miracle sale,” Peterson says. “It really isn’t. It’s just someone that has this experience and this network just executing.”
The deal required a creative-friendly title company and partners who can structure transactions in a trust, bypassing traditional bank financing entirely. Peterson describes this network – title companies, lenders, and structuring specialists – as essential infrastructure for executing these deals consistently.
Where Deals Move and Where Investors Are Buying Land
Properties under $500,000 move faster in both traditional and creative transactions because the buyer pool is larger, Peterson says. Above that threshold, the pool narrows, though creative structuring can still produce results at higher price points by making the financing terms attractive enough to offset the listed price.
Geographically, Peterson points to the Heights area and northwest Houston as active zones – not for resale, but for land acquisition and ground-up construction. Investors are buying land in neighborhoods undergoing gentrification, building both single-family homes and co-living projects. Peterson’s own involvement includes a 14-bed, 14-bath co-living project and a 10-bed, 10-bath project going up in the area. Values in these neighborhoods have increased even over the past couple of years, he says.
For buyers priced out of finished homes in these areas, the activity signals that inventory is being built, but much of it is targeted at renters or investors rather than traditional owner-occupants.
Co-Living as an Investment Thesis
Peterson frames co-living, private bedroom, private bathroom, shared kitchen and laundry, as a direct response to housing affordability. Tenants pay on average $400 to $500 less per month than they would for a comparable studio apartment, he says, while investors benefit from rent-by-the-room economics that improve cash flow per property.
“Your average person can’t even afford a studio apartment rent,” Peterson says. “Co-living gives them that same studio apartment, only with a shared kitchen, those types of things.”
He positions this as both a current opportunity and a long-term structural need, including projects that serve homeless veterans. The model works for investors, Peterson argues, because the demand, people who need affordable housing with private space, is not going away.
For renters, the practical benefit is straightforward: a private room and bathroom at a lower monthly cost than a studio, with the tradeoff of shared common areas. For investors, the per-room rental income can turn a property cash-flow-positive in markets where a traditional single-tenant rental would not.
Rates Are Not Going Back Down
Peterson is direct about the interest rate outlook: he does not expect meaningful declines. “If you look over the history of mortgage rates dating way back, the average mortgage rate is right about where we’re sitting right now,” he says. “What we saw in 2020 and everything, that’s the anomaly.”
His message to buyers and sellers waiting for lower rates is to stop waiting. The current rate environment is historically normal, not historically high. Buyers who delay in hopes of a return to pandemic-era rates are waiting for conditions that were the exception, not the rule.
“There are paths to homeownership that you could pay roughly around the same as you’re paying for rent,” Peterson says. “But now you’re getting that equity, you’re getting the tax benefits.”
For buyers who assume they cannot qualify, Peterson’s broader point is that the barrier may be the lending channel, not their financial position. A buyer earning high 1099 income who gets turned away by a bank may still be able to purchase through a subject-to or wraparound structure, provided the seller’s existing loan terms make the math work for both sides.
About the Expert: Kurt Peterson is a real estate agent with World Wide Realty in Texas, focusing on creative financing transactions in the Houston market.
This article is based on information provided by the expert source cited above. It is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or real estate advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any real estate or financial decisions.